This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Is this your first time reading The Patient Experience Strategist?

Welcome! If a colleague forwarded you this issue, we’re glad you’re here. Don't miss out on future insights. Join our community of healthcare leaders who are navigating the future of care. Get these strategies delivered directly to your inbox every week.

Subscribe Now and Get the Full Experience

Great Care, Poor Experience

A colleague told me last week why she left her provider.

The care was not the problem. She liked him. Trusted his read on things. Left every session better than she walked in.

What wore her down was the rest of it. The calls she had to make twice. The front desk answering questions they had no standing to answer. Saying her history again to someone who should have already had it. One ordinary Tuesday she decided she was done, and she booked with a different clinic.

She lives in a small region. Not many options where she is. So she did not just stop being his patient. She became a thing people in a small town now say to each other. That is what a lost patient actually costs, and almost none of it lands in anything most practices track.

Ask her today whether she was satisfied with her care, and she would say yes. She was. Right up to the day she left.

Satisfied Does Not Mean Staying

She is not unusual. She is the rule. In a study of more than a thousand healthcare consumers, 78 percent said they were satisfied with their care and 80 percent said they would switch providers for convenience alone. The people running that study said it cleaner than I can: excellent care is not enough to earn loyalty.

Another study went further. 60 percent of consumers said they would leave for more trust and respect, while 75 percent were satisfied with their care. Trust and respect beat shorter wait times. They beat lower cost. They beat a closer location. What moves a patient out the door is rarely the medicine. It is whether the machinery around the medicine acted like it could be trusted.

And the trust-breakers are almost never clinical. When Accenture asked why patients walk, the top reasons were things like information that was inconsistent or wrong. Not the diagnosis. The bill that did not match what someone promised. The message that contradicted the last message. The handoff that dropped.

That is the part the field skips. Say patient experience out loud and everyone pictures the visit. The bedside manner. The minutes in the room. We measure that part. We coach it. We give it awards. The moments that actually decide whether a patient comes back, getting in the door, getting from one step to the next, getting a call when it counts, run on goodwill and whoever happens to have a free minute. They fall in the cracks between people and steps and systems, so no one owns them.

Your patients are using those moments to decide about you. Most practices are not even watching them.

Three Cracks, and What They Cost

Start with getting in the door. The first call that is hard to make. The appointment three weeks out. The message left at 7pm that nobody returns until the patient has already booked elsewhere. Plenty of patients are lost here, before they are ever seen, and the loss never shows up because it never became a visit.

Then the handoffs. This is the one people tell me they would fix first if they could fix only one thing. The follow-up that was supposed to happen and did not. The second appointment nobody booked. The care plan everyone nodded at and no one carried. Ordinary stuff. That is exactly why it slips.

And the follow-through after a visit, which is where a single phone call earns its keep. One large health system tracked it: patients reached by a structured post-discharge call came back within a week at a rate of 2.91 percent, against 4.73 percent for the patients they could not reach. A separate randomized study of high-risk patients found that prioritized outreach after discharge cut readmissions by 22 percent. A call. That is the whole intervention.

For a big system, those numbers read as revenue kept and penalties dodged. For a solo practice, they read as the patient who finishes care and refers a friend instead of the one who quietly never rebooks. Same crack, two scales. The patient feels none of it as a metric. They feel it as whether you had your act together when they needed you to.

Where Technology Pays, and Where It Burns Money

This is where a lot of money gets set on fire.

See a crack, buy a platform. That is the reflex. A suite. A six-figure system that swears it will fix the whole journey. And the cost is real money. Run a practice and every tool you add comes out of what you could have paid yourself or your team. Run something bigger and you have watched expensive systems get installed and change nothing. That scrutiny is right. Skepticism here is not stubbornness. It is good sense.

The trap is not spending. The trap is shopping before you have named the problem. Practices that get a return decide what they are fixing first, then buy the smallest thing that fixes it. Practices that waste the money buy the tool and then go looking for a problem to aim it at.

Point it at the moments around scheduling and follow-up and it pays fast, because those moments repeat, they happen on a clock, and they are precisely where people slip. Missed appointments alone run the system an estimated 150 billion dollars a year, about 200 dollars a slot. For an independent practice that is real money walking out every week, not from weak demand, but from people who booked and never showed, or who could not reach a soul to rebook.

The smart, cheap uses look like this, and they work whether you run a system or pick up the phone yourself when the front desk is out sick:

       Answer the after-hours call. A simple automated assistant that books or holds a slot when no human is there means the patient calling at 7pm does not call your competitor at 7:05.

       Close the rebooking gap. Outreach that does more than remind. It surfaces the reason a patient cannot make Tuesday and offers another time before they vanish.

       Make follow-through routine, not heroic. Proactive check-ins that flag the patient who is struggling and hand them to a person. The call still matters. The tool just makes sure the call always happens, instead of happening when somebody remembers.

None of this is cutting-edge. It is overdue. As of 2025, only 19 percent of medical group practices used a chatbot or virtual assistant for patient communication. The surrounding layer is wide open. Whoever builds trust into these moments now is doing it years before most of their competitors notice the moments are there.

One line holds the whole thing together. Technology in this layer should make the human moments more dependable, not stand in for them. The point is never to automate the patient away. The point is to make sure the call gets made, the gap gets closed, the person who needs a person gets one. Trust is the product. The tool is how you keep your word at scale.

The Question

So here is what I would sit with this week, whether you run a service line or run the whole practice yourself. Outside the exam room, where are your patients actually quitting you? Not the date on the chart. The real moment. The call, the gap, the follow-up that never came.

Find that moment and you have found the patient experience nobody is measuring.

If you want to know what those gaps are costing you in real dollars, run your numbers through the Trust Tax calculator here. And if a moment came to mind while you read this, hit reply and tell me. Those replies are where the best of this newsletter comes from.

Until next Wednesday.

Let’s get to work,

Ebony

 

Ebony sitting at table talking on phone

Ebony Langston is the founder of The Patient Experience Strategist™ and a fractional Chief Experience Officer for healthcare organizations rebuilding patient trust as a margin strategy. She has 20+ years of operations experience inside Fortune 100 healthcare organizations and writes weekly for the C-suite executives and PX leaders working to translate patient experience from a cost line into a revenue engine.

Recommended for you