Health inequities currently cost the U.S. healthcare system $320 billion annually. If we change nothing, that figure will exceed $1 trillion by 2040, representing nearly 12.5% of all healthcare spending.

Here's how that $320 billion accumulates:

Diabetes: Black adults are 60% more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes than white adults and 2-3 times more likely to experience complications. Avoidable cost: $15 billion annually.

Asthma: Income disparities lead to late diagnoses and challenges accessing care. Avoidable cost: $2.4 billion annually.

Cardiovascular Disease: Gender disparities mean women experience different heart attack symptoms than documented "classic" symptoms, leading to delayed diagnoses. Avoidable cost: $1.3 billion annually.

Beyond direct healthcare costs, disparities account for $42 billion in lost productivity annually. That's not counting additional economic losses from premature deaths.

The projected rise will cost the average American $3,000 annually by 2040, up from $1,000 today. For historically underserved populations, that burden will be even steeper.

The question isn't whether health equity is the right thing to do. It's whether your organization can survive being on the wrong side of a $1 trillion crisis.

I know what some of you are thinking. In an environment where DEI programs are under attack and "cultural competency" has become politically charged, this feels risky.

Let me be clear about what this is and isn't.

This isn't about building systems that favor one group over another. It's about acknowledging the facts of our shared history: the Tuskegee experiments, the forced sterilizations, the maternal mortality crisis where Black women today are still 2-3 times more likely to die from pregnancy complications. These aren't talking points. They're documented realities that created barriers between communities and healthcare systems.

And here's the economic truth that transcends any political debate: we cannot afford not to address this.

Cultural competency isn't a diversity checkbox. It's the operational infrastructure that determines whether patients trust you enough to show up before conditions become crises. Whether your care plans succeed or fail.

Here's what happens when cultural understanding is missing:

Lost Trust = Lost Revenue: Studies show minority Americans have systematically different healthcare experiences even when they have similar medical conditions and health coverage. That distrust is rooted in documented medical trauma—from Tuskegee to present-day maternal mortality disparities.

Misdiagnosis = Avoidable Complications: Patients with limited English proficiency experience more severe harm when adverse events occur. Why? Symptom descriptions get lost in translation. Medical histories get fragmented. Treatment protocols fail to account for biological and social variations.

Poor Adherence = Readmission Cycles: Hispanic women are half as likely to discuss herbal remedies with their doctors compared to non-Hispanic white women. Older African Americans use home remedies at higher rates and are more likely to distrust vaccination. The care plan that works for someone who grew up trusting doctors won't work for someone whose grandmother was experimented on.

Looking to make smarter decisions faster? I get it—most business news is just noise. That's why I read The Daily Upside. Sharp insights on markets and the economy from former bankers and financial journalists. Over 1 million investors start their day with it. Subscribe free.

Investing isn’t about chasing headlines — it’s about clarity. In a world of hype and hot takes, The Daily Upside delivers real value: sharp, trustworthy insights on markets, business, and the economy, written by former bankers and seasoned financial journalists.

That’s why over 1 million investors — from Wall Street pros to Main Street portfolio managers — start their day with The Daily Upside.

Invest better. Read The Daily Upside.

Subscribe free today.

Cultural competency isn't about memorizing lists of "dos and don'ts" for specific ethnic groups. That leads to dangerous stereotyping. It's about building organizational capacity to understand and respond to diversity at every level of care delivery.

Effective cultural competency includes:

What's breaking: Waiting for patients to request an interpreter. Relying on family members to translate medical information.

What works: Proactive language line deployment. Linguistically concordant staff who share patients' primary language. Translated materials that account for health literacy levels.

What's breaking: One-day cultural sensitivity workshops that focus on food preferences and holidays.

What works: Cross-cultural communication skills training that teaches providers to elicit patient beliefs and ask about traditional remedies without judgment. Implicit bias training that addresses how unconscious assumptions affect clinical decision-making.

The evidence: A 2015 systematic review on implicit racial bias found that medical professionals expressed the same biases as the general population, resulting in Black, Hispanic, American Indian, and Asian patients consistently receiving lower quality care than white patients.

What's breaking: Tracking average patient satisfaction without disaggregating by race, ethnicity, language, or disability status.

What works: EHR systems that capture race, ethnicity, primary language, and social risk factors. Quality dashboards that show disparity gaps, not just aggregate performance.

The challenge: Most healthcare organizations don't even know the race, ethnicity, and language needs of their patient population. That makes it impossible to track whether interventions reduce disparities.

What's breaking: Expecting patients to navigate your system without understanding the community context they're coming from.

What works: Community health workers who bridge clinical and cultural worlds. Faith-based partnerships that build trust through existing relationships.

The ROI: Community-based interventions reduce emergency department utilization, improve chronic disease management, and increase preventive care engagement. All of this directly impacts your operating margin.

Here's the business reality: health equity isn't a cost center. It's a $47 billion market opportunity you're currently designing around instead of for.

I wrote about this back in November when I was at BlackWeek, a culture and economic forum. Health equity had its own track at a conference focused on economic buying power and cultural impact. That was a market signal.

When a forum dedicated to the economic influence of Black communities dedicates significant programming to healthcare, it's telling you something: the culture and experience economy that's transformed retail, entertainment, and hospitality now applies to healthcare. 75% of life sciences executives and 64% of healthcare executives are substantially increasing their strategic focus on health equity in 2025.

By 2050, people of color will represent more than half of the U.S. population. If your patient experience strategy still assumes a white, English-speaking, middle-class default, you're building for a shrinking market while your competitors capture growth.

The shift is already here. The patients walking through your doors today are telling you what kind of system they need: through their home remedies, their hesitation, their questions about whether you'll understand them.

Hospital cultural competency directly correlates with patient experience scores. California hospitals with higher cultural competency ratings showed better CAHPS scores across all patient populations, but particularly among minority patients who historically report lower satisfaction.

When patients feel understood (when the care team knows why ginger ale is medicine, when providers ask about home remedies without judgment, when discharge instructions account for multigenerational households), they come back. They bring their families. They become the kind of loyal patients who defend your reputation in community conversations.

Culturally incompetent care doesn't just cost you patient loyalty. It exposes you to malpractice claims, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Patients with limited English proficiency who experience adverse events are more likely to be harmed severely than English-proficient counterparts.

The 2024 updates to Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act mandate language access and nondiscrimination protections. Organizations that treat these as compliance minimums rather than care quality standards are gambling with both patient safety and legal liability.

Speaking of scaling systems that work—if you're facing peak season volume, you know the dilemma: hire temps (expensive) or burn out your team (worse). Smarter organizations let AI handle predictable volume so humans stay focused on what matters. Check your options.

It's peak season, so volume's about to spike. Most teams either hire temps (expensive) or burn out their people (worse). See what smarter teams do: let AI handle predictable volume so your humans stay great.

Check your options

If you're leading patient experience in 2026, health equity can't be a separate initiative running parallel to your CX strategy. It has to be the foundation.

Start by making the invisible visible. Pull your patient satisfaction data and disaggregate it by race, ethnicity, primary language, disability status, and ZIP code. If your NPS for Spanish-speaking patients is 20 points below English speakers, you've found your first equity gap.

Then build the infrastructure to close those gaps.

Start with hiring community health workers who share the language and cultural background of your patient population. Train frontline staff to ask "What remedies or treatments have you been using at home?" instead of assuming biomedical interventions are the only care happening.

Redesign patient education materials with input from the communities you're trying to reach, not just clinical experts. Create linguistically appropriate services that go beyond translated documents to culturally adapted messaging.

Finally, understand how equity performance impacts your bottom line. CMS's Health Equity Index, which takes effect in 2027, will directly impact Star Ratings and reimbursement for Medicare Advantage plans. Plans with strong equity performance can gain up to half a Star Rating, which translates directly to higher reimbursements and bonus payments.

For hospitals, CMS has introduced health equity-focused measures in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program that affect your ability to qualify for full payment updates.

The message is clear: closing equity gaps isn't optional anymore. It's embedded in how CMS calculates what they pay you.

That baker on "Next Level Baker" didn't win her challenge outright. But she turned a bottle of ginger ale (the one ingredient she had) into something good enough to move her to the next level kitchen. She did it by understanding the cultural power of what looked like limitation to everyone else.

Your patients are doing the same thing every day. They're showing up with home remedies and cultural health practices and well-earned caution born from generations of experience. They're navigating a system that often doesn't understand why ginger ale is medicine.

You have a choice in how you respond to that.

You can treat it as a barrier to overcome, something to educate away or work around. Or you can see it for what it really is: the foundation for building trust that creates lifelong patient relationships.

Which path you choose determines whether you're spending the next decade playing catch-up or building market share.

The $320 billion annual cost of health inequity isn't an abstraction. It's what happens when millions of individual moments add up. Moments where patients felt unseen, where care plans failed because they didn't account for cultural context, where preventable complications became crises because trust was never established.

By 2040, that cost will triple to $1 trillion. Not because we don't know what to do, but because too many organizations are still treating equity as a side project instead of the core business strategy it needs to be.

Here's the reality: the demographic shift isn't coming—it's already here. The patients you'll serve in 2026 and beyond are from communities that have historically experienced inequity in healthcare. The systems you're building today either prepare for that reality or ignore it.

And the organizations that figure that out first, that understand cultural competency isn't corporate social responsibility but competitive strategy, will be the ones still standing when the bill comes due.

This isn't about doing the right thing versus doing the profitable thing. It's about recognizing that in healthcare, they've always been the same thing. We just forgot that somewhere along the way.

📥 Download: "The New Health Economy" — Learn how to align social determinants of health (SDOH) interventions with value-based care contracts and financial strategy. Includes frameworks for building the business case that connects health equity investments to reimbursement models and revenue growth.

📞 Book: "Q1 Strategy Session: Building Your Adaptive 2026 Patient Experience Roadmap." Let's map your equity goals to your revenue strategy and identify the three highest-impact interventions for your patient population.

💬 Reply: What's one cultural health practice you've seen patients bring into your system that your staff didn't know how to respond to?

A Final Thought: The demographic shift isn't coming—it's already here. The question isn't whether you should prepare for it, but whether you're willing to learn from the patients who've been telling you what they need all along.

Don't wait to retrofit equity into systems designed for a population that no longer exists. Start building for the patients walking through your doors today, because they're already showing you what the future looks like.